Diabetes Education and Research Center
Back Chats
On Tue Oct 8 23:49:22 2002 () said:
Squats whatever happened long ago with
research on animals has no meaning on you feeling it is ok to continue killing
and maiming them today. You are a closed minded brutal person. We would all do
better without you around posting your dullwitted dreams on here.
On Tue Oct 8 23:00:10 2002 () said:
Hmmm chemical supplements kill.
On Tue Oct 8 22:59:21 2002 () said:
Squats please don't eat my puppy !
On Tue Oct 8 22:14:24 2002 Squats () said:
Faith: I cannot help but wonder
of some of these Peta followers would be dead if it hadn;t been for the research
of Bantam and Best on animals. I would be dead too! Hmmm! Peta kills.
On Tue Oct 8 17:25:32 2002 () said:
Faith 'expermintation =
experimentation.'
On Tue Oct 8 17:06:33 2002 () said:
16:57:10 - Yeah, right!! NOT!!
13:22:29 - Now, that is funny!!
On Tue Oct 8 16:57:10 2002 () said:
FAith the AP's are making a fool of
you.
On Tue Oct 8 13:22:29 2002 SUNG TO 'FOLSOM PRISON BLUES' () said:
I HEAR
THAT GREASE A FRYIN, ITS FRYIN IN THE PAN.........AND I AINT SEEN A VEGETABLE
SINCE...I DONT KNOW WHEN.........I SHOT A COW IN RENO.....JUST TO FRY HIM
UP......AS I SMOTHER HIM IN ONIONS.....PETA CAN KISS MY BUTT........ HEH HEH
On Tue Oct 8 11:25:58 2002 () said:
A dumb animal belongs in a fryin pan
sauteed in butter or friccaseed with a BBQ sauce lightly flavoured with dill,
washed down with whole milk and a piece of cheesecake. Then go for a long walk
in the cool night air in my fur coat and sheepskin gloves!!!!!!!!!!!!! heh heh
On Tue Oct 8 11:05:19 2002 Faith () said:
10:41:31, I don't wear fur, and
you disregarded the whole point of my post! We wouldn't have had insulin, if it
were not for animals and animal expermintation. Focus on the topic!!
On Tue Oct 8 10:41:31 2002 () said:
FAITH = BABY MINK KILLER = FUR WEARER =
HIPPOCRIT
On Tue Oct 8 10:38:02 2002 Faith () said:
Have some of you forgotten, if it
weren't for the islets from cows and pigs, we wouldn't have had insulin years
back????? Animals are here for man, not the other way around. BUT NOT FOR
UNETHICAL TREATMENT!!!
On Tue Oct 8 10:31:18 2002 () said:
A dumb animal belongs in a fryin pan
sauteed in butter or friccaseed with a BBQ sauce lightly flavoured with dill,
washed down with whole milk and a piece of cheesecake. Then go for a long walk
in the cool night air in my fur coat and sheepskin gloves!!!!!!!!!!!!! heh
heh
On Tue Oct 8 10:23:28 2002 () said:
10.00.53...........You must be
stupid.....how can one compare animal rights to the causes of the Underground RR
or French resistance???????????? Read more betterly before you type
ignoramus!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Tue Oct 8 10:01:53 2002 () said:
yummy...
On Tue Oct 8 10:00:53 2002 () said:
Dear 09:35 your post makes no sense,
please rewrite it so we can understand why you do not like the underground
railroad...were you a slave owner or a Nazi ? Please explain better.
On Tue Oct 8 09:58:34 2002 () said:
More beer, less milk, way to go Peta
!
On Tue Oct 8 09:56:33 2002 () said:
Sure stirred up the meat eaters, fur
wearers and kitten killers, It's the Squats outlook that PETA wants to get rid
of, I support that. If you can't kill it and eat it, you're outta luck, Right
Squats ?
On Tue Oct 8 09:35:26 2002 what a crock!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! () said:
I have watched this PETA thing back and forth and decided to go look at
their site. For them to compare themselves with French resistors or the
Underground Railroad is the dumbest thing I have ever read. The following is a
line from their site answering the question asking if they are terrorists:
"Throughout history, some people have felt the need to break the law to fight
injustice. The Underground Railroad and the French Resistance are both examples
of people breaking the law in order to answer to a higher morality."......No
thanks PETA, I'll just laugh while having my favourite dinner
tonight....Lambchops...............ummmmmmmmm...........yummy.........
On Tue Oct 8 05:55:55 2002 Squats () said:
BTW, PETA is an extreme group
trying to force veganism as the only "healthy" way to go. No one (I hope) wants
animals mistreated. However, they are a legitimate food source. It is improper
to lay a guilt trip on people because they eat an egg!
On Tue Oct 8 03:17:56 2002 Squats () said:
Maybe this approach will work
better; Go vegan? It can only work with careful supplementation, including
glutamine, iron, branched chain amino acids, whey protein, etc. A diet on this
sort lacks in both macro and micronutrients necessary for good health. This is
especially true if exercise is attempted. Mo, I am not pushing these
supplements; but a diet lacking necessary nutrients MUST be supplemented. What
is so hard about this?
On Tue Oct 8 02:29:46 2002 Squats () said:
Dr. means nothing. Quacks
abound.
On Tue Oct 8 02:28:48 2002 Squats () said:
"Healthy" eating to cause
kwashikor, muscle wasting, osteoparosis and anemia can be found at peta,com.
Sheesh, go learn proper nutrition, please.
On Mon Oct 7 18:21:45 2002 () said:
Intresting reading from Dr. Neal Barnard
and the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine "Healthy Eating to Prevent
and Treat Diabetes". Can be ordered from Peta.com or Amazon.com Websites.
On Mon Oct 7 06:08:24 2002 Squats () said:
Steve; I do not see much use of
xylitol anymore. Sucralose is being used increasingly, though. Both the meal
replacements I use are sweetened with it. Thanks for the info.
On Mon Oct 7 01:58:54 2002 Stephen Forbush (steveforbush@mindspring.com) said:
49Discovered in 1891 by a German chemist xylitol has been used as a
sweetening agent in human food since the 1960s. Its safety has been reviewed by
the US Food and Drug Administration and by the Joint Expert Committee on Food
Additives (advisors to the World Health Organisation and the United Nations).
The JEC placed it in the safest category in which they can place a food
additive.
On Mon Oct 7 00:16:54 2002 () said:
Faith says: "diabetes is Gods punishment
on you "
On Sun Oct 6 17:41:30 2002 () said:
FAith says " that is Gods threat "
On Sun Oct 6 13:48:01 2002 () said:
Faith says: That is a threat, it is
wishful thinking" Christian Censor Talk >
On Sat Oct 5 20:52:02 2002 () said:
koo koo ka choo
On Sat Oct 5 20:51:45 2002 () said:
i am the egg man
On Fri Oct 4 15:44:51 2002 () said:
the kettle is black
On Fri Oct 4 10:46:11 2002 () said:
god told me to hate you
On Fri Oct 4 10:45:37 2002 () said:
yea get a life
On Fri Oct 4 09:59:59 2002 Faith () said:
22:07:09 - Nope, God doesn't need
my hand, He does ok on His own!
20:34:24, you are too funny for words. Again, talk about the pot calling the
kettle black! My dear fellow, you so dearly need to get a life.
On Fri Oct 4 09:55:50 2002 Faith () said:
Leona, Whoa, I read 31, and
thought, that is way too low! Where do you live? Our desired goals are between
90-120. Although my doctors told me 150 is ok, but not desirable. I know in
Canada, the UK it is figured differently.
Did you check with your aunt's doctor or diabetic care team?
On Fri Oct 4 01:20:30 2002 () said:
Hi Leona...yes, 31 is very dangerous. At
her age she may have never come out of it..
On Fri Oct 4 01:15:28 2002 Leona McGinnis (migizii@hotmail.com) said:
My
aunts sugar level was 31. not 3.1 Just in case I didnt make myself clear.
On Fri Oct 4 01:07:10 2002 Leona McGinnis (migizii@hotmail.com) said:
Tonight I was concerned. My aunt who is 74 has diabetes. Her sugar level was
31 this evening. Should we have taken her to the hospital.. I thought that was
too high. Your advice will be appreciated
Copyright © 2002 Diabetes Education and Research Center